Section 482 Is Not To Be Used Lightly
“We will go to the High Court”!
 
It is wise to think twice before embarking on that journey. It can spoil your case. What exactly Section 482 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is, should be spelt out first. ‘Section 482’, being such a big number, seems to carry a lot of weight. It can, but rarely does. Ask Arvind Kejriwal.
 
Section 482 is very well-intentioned. In today’s highly vitiated atmosphere, especially the saas-bahu conundrum, it provides a safe passage, a way out for the innocent. But, there is a BIG ‘but’. The courts are chary in using it, let alone discriminately. Due process, the ends of justice, the truth, all come into play. Section 482 is usually not confirmed. When, then, is it applicable?
 
You be the judge.
 
Mr K says, or writes, something which Mr J does not like. Mr J thinks it is something that spoils his name in society, harms his business, etc. He files both civil and criminal actions. In the criminal case, Mr K becomes the accused; in the other suit, he is the defendant. Criminal cases require the accused to be present in court, a demeaning experience, where a separate bench, guarded, is provided. Ignominy, even if eventually acquitted. So Mr K asks the High Court, a court superior than the one he is tried in, to quash the proceedings and set him free. Failing which, he moves the Supreme Court. Should he now get relief?
 
In the Kejriwal case, even the Supreme Court refused. The argument usually is that relief must be first argued in the trial court. Why, then, does Section 482 exist? 
 
Gross abuse of the legal process is not unknown; In fact, it is quite common. But, in a democracy, judicial access is available to all. If the accused can prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that he is innocent,  Section 482 comes to his rescue. If the accused can prove that he was not present at the place of the crime, or that he is incapable of such an act, or that it was a clear case of mistaken identity, he will see the action dismissed.
 
Another way to get the quashing is to argue points of law in the superior courts. Most often, it is a rehash of facts; a method that looks defeat in the face and capitulates. 
 
Readers will recall two columns written in the recent past. One dealt with the ethics question, where we had argued that the same matter cannot be heard in a lower court after being rejected in a superior forum. The other was of the staying of criminal cases while the civil suit was heard. Similarity exists, to a very great extent, between the Kejriwal appeals and the articles. We are glad that both our stands have been vindicated. 
 
The moral of the story is this: Do not rush to higher courts without due thought. It can be very counterproductive. ‘To Hell and Back’ is best left to Hollywood.
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
A Delhi High Court judgement, in a Section 482 matter, illustrates how courts think.
“Later in State of Haryana vs Bhajan Lal 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335, the Supreme Court reiterated the settled position and gave illustrative examples of when the power under Section 482 could be exercised. It however struck a note of caution… (SCC, p.379). We also give a note of caution to the effect that the power of quashing a criminal proceeding should be exercised very sparingly and with circumspection and that too in the rarest of rare cases; that the court will not be justified in embarking upon an enquiry as to the reliability or genuineness or otherwise of the allegations made… extraordinary or inherent powers do not confer an arbitrary jurisdiction on the court to act according to its whim or caprice.” (Devender Singh vs State and Anr. 23 May 2008)
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User

    Rail Accident Victims Can Approach Consumer Courts
    Nearly every few weeks there is a train accident in some part of our vast country, resulting in deaths and injuries. From derailment of empty coaches to derailment of trains, with hundreds of passengers on board, is becoming a common occurrence. According to one report, the death toll in FY16-17 is already 186, the highest since 2010.
     
    While nobody can doubt the sincerity of the...
    Premium Content
    Monthly Digital Access

    Subscribe

    Already A Subscriber?
    Login
    Yearly Digital Access

    Subscribe

    Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MAS member?
    Login

    Yearly Subscriber Login

    Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation
  • Swamy slams CBI, ED over probe against Karti Chidambaram
    BJP leader Subramanian Swamy on Monday alleged that the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate had not taken their probe against Karti Chidambaram, son of former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram, to its logical end, and noted that they had been provided details of his "21 undeclared foreign accounts".
     
    Speaking to the media here, Swamy alleged that one of the 21 accounts was "directly owned" by Karti Chidambaram and the "rest by his companies". 
     
    "It is shocking that CBI and ED having been provided the details of 21 undeclared foreign accounts of Karti Chidambaram and of the companies he controls, have failed to proceed," Swamy said.
     
    He alleged that Karti, in his election affidavit for 2014 Lok Sabha polls, mentioned that he had no foreign accounts.
     
    Answering a query about the quantum of money in the accounts, Swamy said: "He must have amassed easily a total of Rs 6 lakh crore." 
     
    Swamy alleged the Finance Ministry had "favoured" Karti and said he had written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi over the issue.
     
    Hitting out at the Finance Ministry over demonetisation, the BJP leader said, "excellent measure of demonetisation has not produced the full desired result because of lack of cooperation from the ministry".
     
    Karti is being probed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with Aircel-Maxis deal. 
     
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User

    COMMENTS

    Suketu Shah

    3 years ago

    Whatever Dr Swamy has stated last 5-6 yrs atleast has tuned out to be true.4 months he stated GSTN was a national risk,now that has turned out to be true.

    Only frauds and cheats wl gang up against Dr Swamy.It is great India has people like Dr Swamy,there is so much to look forward to towards the betterment of the country.

    Kumar Swamy

    3 years ago

    Swamy said: "He must have amassed easily a total of Rs 6 lakh crore."

    Are you kidding? Rs 6 lakh crores? How can one person hide Rs 6 lakh crores? May be, I/we are naïve to understand the mechanism. Any explanation?
     

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
      Loading...
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email

    BUY NOW

    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone